All sectors

Sector assessment

Insurance

10 laundering methods apply to this sector. 7 are rarely covered in standard AML training. The sector assessment uses 10 cases.

Insurance proceeds receive less downstream scrutiny because they arrive from a regulated insurer, which makes the payout itself a laundering mechanism.

Start The Policy Book — 8 minNo account required · Full debrief at the end
Typologies for you
10
Assessed
10
Rarely trained
7
Aimed at
MLRO, Head of Financial Crime, Head of Underwriting Controls

The control gap we probe

Financial crime controls concentrate at claims, because claims are where fraud against the insurer happens. Laundering runs the other way: the premium is genuine, the claim may never come, and the firm loses nothing. Nobody is incentivised to investigate a customer who overpays and then walks away.

Supervisory context

Life insurance is a regulated sector under the Money Laundering Regulations, and FATF maintains dedicated risk-based approach guidance for it, issued October 2018. FATF's own typology work records that payments originating from insurers are widely assumed to be clean and attract little downstream scrutiny — the assumption the typology depends on.

Who this is for

This is written for life and investment-related insurance, and for the intermediaries who place it. General insurance sits outside the Money Laundering Regulations, so a motor, property or commercial lines broker is not a relevant person and this assessment is not aimed at you. The line runs through the product rather than the firm: a composite insurer or a broker doing both is in scope for the life and investment side of the book only.

The Insurance Assessment

Not one case. Every case that exercises a typology on your list is part of your mark, weighted by how much of your exposure it carries. The weights are derived from the register rather than chosen, so adding a case re-derives them instead of leaving the old ones wrong.

Cases in your assessment
10
Time to sit all of them
78 min
Typologies covered
10
Left uncovered
0
CaseYour typologiesShare of your mark
The Policy Bookwritten for your desk728%
The Verification Desk523%
The Relationship Review314%
The Betting Account15%
The Client Account15%
The Exchange Desk15%
The Incoming Payment15%
The Onboarding Interview15%
The Securities Book15%
The Sponsorship File15%

What you get for the price

£99one payment, 12 months, nothing renews

  • All 10 cases in your sector assessment, about 78 minutes, plus every other case on the site
  • Your mark for the Insurance Assessment, and a full debrief on every case naming each finding and its source
  • A certificate recording exact CPD hours, publicly verifiable
  • Re-sit any case as often as you like for 12 months

£750pilot, up to 25 people, invoiced

  • Your whole team sits the Insurance Assessment, not a single case
  • A gap report naming which of your 10 typologies the team detected and which they missed, with detection rates
  • Every participant gets their own full debrief
  • Deducted from a licence if you take one within 90 days
See an example gap report for Insurance

No VAT is charged. Team licences and seat counts.

The 10 typologies that apply to this sector

Drawn from the full register and filtered to this sector. Each entry states what the typology looks like inside your own systems, and names the source it came from. 10 of the 10 are currently exercised by an assessment case; the rest are documented here and not yet built into one.

Corporate and identity6

Necrofinance: dead directors and zombie accountsRarely covered in training

In the assessment

Deceased individuals are recorded as directors, officers and shareholders, and accounts opened by the living are run on after death. There is no accomplice who can be pressured, because the nominal principal is dead.

What the analyst sees

An account in good standing whose signatory died in a jurisdiction the firm does not search, filings continuing for a director with no verifiable life, and mandates never refreshed because the account never triggered a review.

Beneficial Ownership Obfuscation

In the assessment

Layered holding structures across free-zone and offshore jurisdictions terminate in a corporate nominee, so the declared beneficial owner is asserted rather than evidenced.

What the analyst sees

A structure chart that never evidences control, a nominee shareholder defeating verification, and a customer who offers further documents instead of an answer.

Synthetic and AI-Generated Onboarding DocumentsRarely covered in training

In the assessment

Statements, identity documents and supporting evidence are generated rather than obtained, and are internally consistent in ways genuine documents are not.

What the analyst sees

Statements with no fees or charges across months, running balances consistent to the penny, logos at incorrect aspect ratio, institution codes in the wrong format, identity photographs internally inconsistent or inconsistent with stated age, third-party webcam plugins during liveness checks.

Synthetic Identities at ScaleRarely covered in training

In the assessment

A person who does not exist is assembled from a mixture of real and fabricated data, passed through onboarding, allowed to build a credit and transaction history, and then used as durable laundering infrastructure rather than for a single fraud.

What the analyst sees

Thin-file customers who behave impeccably for months, clusters sharing partial attributes such as address, device or contact details, credit files that begin abruptly in adulthood, and accounts whose only real purpose emerges long after onboarding.

Synthetic Voice Against Telephone and Callback ControlsRarely covered in training

In the assessment

Cloned voice defeats the control the firm added to catch impersonation: the callback. Voice biometrics and telephone banking authentication are attacked with audio generated from publicly available recordings.

What the analyst sees

Voice authentication passing on a call whose channel or device signals are inconsistent with the customer, callbacks answered on newly registered numbers, and instructions confirmed by voice that the customer later disputes entirely.

Deepfake-Enabled Payment Instruction FraudRarely covered in training

In the assessment

Synthetic video and voice impersonate executives on a live call to authorise urgent transfers, defeating the callback and video-verification controls firms adopted precisely to stop email-based impersonation.

What the analyst sees

Multiple urgent same-day transfers to new beneficiaries authorised by one employee, outside normal approval patterns, following a confidential instruction the payer cannot corroborate internally.

Assets and stores of value1

Insurance Product MisuseRarely covered in training

In the assessment

A policy is used as a store and cleaning mechanism: a large single premium is paid, the policy is surrendered early at a deliberate loss, and the proceeds leave as an insurer payment, which downstream institutions treat as inherently clean.

What the analyst sees

Single premium payments from third parties or unrelated jurisdictions, early surrender accepted at a material penalty, frequent changes of beneficiary, and cooling-off cancellations with refunds directed to a different account from the one that paid.

Professional and market2

Laundering and Fraud as a ServiceRarely covered in training

In the assessment

Capability is rented rather than built. Subscription platforms supply mule account provisioning, KYC-bypass tooling, synthetic identity generation, deepfake kits and end-to-end laundering, so an operator needs money rather than skill.

What the analyst sees

The same tooling signature across customers with no other connection: identical document templates, shared device or capture characteristics, and mule accounts appearing in coordinated batches rather than individually.

Bribery Conduits and Consultancy Payments

In the assessment

Improper payments are routed as consultancy fees, royalties, dividends or capital gains so the receipt reads as ordinary income.

What the analyst sees

Consultancy receipts from jurisdictions where the recipient holds influence, payments unconnected to any deliverable, and timing correlated with contract awards.

Sanctions and state actors1

Sanctions-Evasion Ownership Restructuring

In the assessment

Ownership is diluted below control thresholds or transferred to non-designated relatives and managers after designation, leaving effective control unchanged.

What the analyst sees

Ownership changes closely following a designation date, incoming owners with no commercial history, and unchanged management across the restructuring.

Sit your own sector's case before you commit a team to it

The Policy Book carries 7 of the 10 typologies above and 28 per cent of your mark. Full debrief, no account, no card.

Start The Policy Book

Run the full Insurance benchmark across up to 25 people for £750.

No integration · No customer data · Confidential cohort available

The weekly case

One documented case each week. One decision. The answer and the source afterwards.

One email a week. One case, one decision, and the source. Unsubscribe in a click; we do not share the list.