Property, Art and High-Value Dealers

AML Judgment Gap Report · Full findings

Property, Art and High-Value Dealers

1 November 2026 · 14 participants · 14 cases each · 196 runs · September cohort

This is a specimen. The cases, the weights, the methods and the sources are real, and are what your team would sit and what your own report would cite. The scores are invented, for a hypothetical cohort of 14 people. A real report carries your own results and nothing else.

9/18Material gapsHalf or fewer detected

Your team detects 9 of the 18 money laundering methods that apply to this sector. 6 need action, and 3 of those are rarely covered by standard training.

4 of these are urgent. Your team was tested on them and missed them.

Detected 9Partial 3Missed 6

Your assessment is 14 cases, not one. Each covers a different part of your exposure, and the appendix shows how many of your 18 methods each one carries. Measured against the methods that apply to this sector, not against other firms.

Since the last sitting

September cohort against March cohort. Your team detected 4 methods then and 9 now. 5 went backwards.

6 closed2 improved5 declined5 unchanged
MethodMarch cohort to September cohortMovement
Art and Antiquities: self-dealing at auctionRarely trained
67%Partial45%Missed
Declined
Estate Administration and ProbateRarely trained
67%Partial45%Missed
Declined
Fabricated Rental Income and Ghost Tenants
67%Partial45%Missed
Declined
Gold, Refining and Free-Trade ZonesRarely trained
86%Detected64%Partial
Declined
Investment Migration and Residence Schemes
67%Partial45%Missed
Declined
High-Value Portable Goods
26%Missed42%Missed
Improved
Mirror Transfers and Daigou PurchasingRarely trained
26%Missed42%Missed
Improved
Cash-Intensive Front Business
71%Partial89%Detected
Closed
Ghost Companies: struck off but still transactingRarely trained
67%Partial84%Detected
Closed
Loan-Back ArrangementsRarely trained
67%Partial84%Detected
Closed
Mortgage and Property Finance Fraud
67%Partial84%Detected
Closed
Real Estate: engineered foreclosure and retained controlRarely trained
67%Partial84%Detected
Closed
Synthetic and AI-Generated Onboarding DocumentsRarely trained
66%Partial83%Detected
Closed

What to do

For each one, ask a single question. Does the team not know the method, or do they know it and have no rule that would surface it? The first needs a briefing. The second is a control gap, and it is the more serious answer.

High
Tested and missed, on a case covering a large part of your exposure.
Medium
Tested and missed on a smaller case, or never tested on one that matters.
Low
Never tested, and a small part of your exposure.

Ordered by priority. The reason for each is printed with it, so you can disagree with the ranking.

  1. 01

    Estate Administration and Probate

    High

    Your team was tested on this and missed it. It sits in The Relationship Review, which covers 6 of the 18 methods that apply to you. Training rarely covers this, so a refresher will not fix it.

    Result
    Caught 45% of the laundering customer's alerts.
    Tested by
    The Relationship Review — covers 6 of your 18 methods
    Training
    Rarely covered by standard annual refreshers
    Now · Brief

    Send the team the register entry. It has the mechanism, the signal and the sources.

    30 days · Control

    Which rule, report or alert would surface this?

    Estate funds arriving from a professional's client account with no visibility of their origin; assets appearing in an estate that the deceased's known circumstances do not explain; and a firm that is itself the executor, where no external party sees the administration at all.

    90 days · Re-test

    Sit The Relationship Review again, on the version the team has not seen.

    OwnerTarget date
  2. 02

    Art and Antiquities: self-dealing at auction

    High

    Your team was tested on this and missed it. It sits in The Private Client File, which covers 4 of the 18 methods that apply to you. Training rarely covers this, so a refresher will not fix it.

    Result
    Caught 45% of the laundering customer's alerts.
    Tested by
    The Private Client File — covers 4 of your 18 methods
    Training
    Rarely covered by standard annual refreshers
    Now · Brief

    Send the team the register entry. It has the mechanism, the signal and the sources.

    30 days · Control

    Which rule, report or alert would surface this?

    Auction proceeds from a sale where consignor and buyer are ultimately the same interest, and valuations resting entirely on expert opinion where no non-destructive dating is possible.

    90 days · Re-test

    Sit The Private Client File again, on the version the team has not seen.

    OwnerTarget date
  3. 03

    Fabricated Rental Income and Ghost Tenants

    High

    Your team was tested on this and missed it. It sits in The Private Client File, which covers 4 of the 18 methods that apply to you.

    Result
    Caught 45% of the laundering customer's alerts.
    Tested by
    The Private Client File — covers 4 of your 18 methods
    Now · Brief

    Send the team the register entry. It has the mechanism, the signal and the sources.

    30 days · Control

    Which rule, report or alert would surface this?

    Rent credits inconsistent with occupancy or utility data, tenants who never pay late, and payments originating from accounts connected to the landlord.

    90 days · Re-test

    Sit The Private Client File again, on the version the team has not seen.

    OwnerTarget date
  4. 04

    Investment Migration and Residence Schemes

    High

    Your team was tested on this and missed it. It sits in The Private Client File, which covers 4 of the 18 methods that apply to you.

    Result
    Caught 45% of the laundering customer's alerts.
    Tested by
    The Private Client File — covers 4 of your 18 methods
    Now · Brief

    Send the team the register entry. It has the mechanism, the signal and the sources.

    30 days · Control

    Which rule, report or alert would surface this?

    Source of wealth evidenced principally by the qualifying investment itself, onboarding shortly after grant of status, and jurisdiction of residence inconsistent with any economic or family connection.

    90 days · Re-test

    Sit The Private Client File again, on the version the team has not seen.

    OwnerTarget date
  5. 05

    High-Value Portable Goods

    Medium

    Your team was tested on this and missed it.

    Result
    Caught 42% of the laundering customer's alerts.
    Tested by
    The Goods Chain — covers 2 of your 18 methods
    Now · Brief

    Send the team the register entry. It has the mechanism, the signal and the sources.

    30 days · Control

    Which rule, report or alert would surface this?

    Dealer accounts taking third-party payments for goods delivered to someone else, part-exchange chains that never settle in cash, and customers whose purchases exceed any evidenced income.

    90 days · Re-test

    Sit The Goods Chain again, on the version the team has not seen.

    OwnerTarget date
  6. 06

    Mirror Transfers and Daigou Purchasing

    Medium

    Your team was tested on this and missed it. Training rarely covers this, so a refresher will not fix it.

    Result
    Caught 42% of the laundering customer's alerts.
    Tested by
    The Goods Chain — covers 2 of your 18 methods
    Training
    Rarely covered by standard annual refreshers
    Now · Brief

    Send the team the register entry. It has the mechanism, the signal and the sources.

    30 days · Control

    Which rule, report or alert would surface this?

    Card accounts repaid in cash or by unrelated third parties, purchase volumes far exceeding personal use, and paired domestic flows in two jurisdictions with no instrument connecting them.

    90 days · Re-test

    Sit The Goods Chain again, on the version the team has not seen.

    OwnerTarget date

On your own report

Each line carries your team’s result, an owner and a date. The re-test at 90 days shows what has moved.

Appendix

Evidence

Everything the finding above rests on, for anyone who wants to check it.

By case

The 14 cases that make up your assessment. Detection rate is the share of the laundering customer’s alerts the team caught. The last column counts people who escalated everything, which catches the laundering customer without deciding anything and scores badly for that reason.

CaseYour methodsShare of assessmentRunsMedian markDetection rateEscalated everything
The Relationship Review622%144945%3 of 14
The Client Account517%148784%3 of 14
The Private Client File413%144845%4 of 14
The Policy Book310%148783%3 of 14
The Client Engagement27%149189%3 of 14
The Goods Chain27%144542%2 of 14
The Collection Network13%146157%2 of 14
The Disclosure13%1485——
The Exchange Desk13%146966%3 of 14
The Funnel Account13%147876%2 of 14
The Onboarding Interview13%1487——
The Securities Book13%145350%3 of 14
The Trade Corridor13%146664%2 of 14
The Verification Desk13%148583%2 of 14

Every method

All 18 methods that apply to this sector, and where each one is documented. Full citations are at amlbenchmark.com/coverage.

MethodCaseRateResult
Art and Antiquities: self-dealing at auctionrarely trainedThe Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (Amendment) Regulations 2026 (SI 2026/621), made 9 June 2026 and in force 30 June…The Private Client File45%Missed
Estate Administration and Probaterarely trainedSolicitors Regulation Authority, thematic review of probate and estate administration (13 December 2024): 25 firms visited, three…The Relationship Review45%Missed
Mirror Transfers and Daigou Purchasingrarely trainedFinCEN advisory on Chinese Money Laundering Networks (28 August 2025), identifying mirror transactions, money mules and…The Goods Chain42%Missed
Fabricated Rental Income and Ghost TenantsLetting agency businesses were brought into the UK regulated sector by the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (Amendment)…The Private Client File45%Missed
High-Value Portable GoodsHM Treasury and Home Office, National Risk Assessment of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing 2025 (July 2025), paragraphs…The Goods Chain42%Missed
Investment Migration and Residence SchemesEuropean Commission v Malta (CJEU, Case C-181/23, judgment of 29 April 2025), holding that Malta's…The Private Client File45%Missed
Gold, Refining and Free-Trade Zonesrarely trainedUS Treasury (OFAC) press release of 25 June 2026 designating Gasabo Gold Refinery LTD of Kigali, its chairman Jean Malic Kalima…The Trade Corridor64%Partial
Human Trafficking and Modern Slavery Proceedsrarely trainedFinCEN Advisory FIN-2020-A008, Supplemental Advisory on Identifying and Reporting Human Trafficking and Related Activity (15…The Funnel Account76%Partial
Bulk Cash Smuggling and Cash CouriersNCA press release of 28 May 2026 on a cross-border investigation across the island of Ireland: six arrests in Cookstown and the…The Collection Network57%Partial
Ghost Companies: struck off but still transactingrarely trainedNCA, 16 July 2025: 11,500 UK companies struck off the Companies House register following a multi-agency operation with Companies…The Client Account84%Detected
Loan-Back Arrangementsrarely trainedFATF, Professional Money Laundering (July 2018)The Client Account84%Detected
Necrofinance: dead directors and zombie accountsrarely trainedICIJ Panama Papers investigation (2016) into Mossack FonsecaThe Client Account84%Detected
Real Estate: engineered foreclosure and retained controlrarely trainedFinCEN's Anti-Money Laundering Regulations for Residential Real Estate Transfers Rule, in force 1 March 2026 after a postponement…The Client Account84%Detected
Synthetic and AI-Generated Onboarding Documentsrarely trainedFinCEN Alert FIN-2024-Alert004 (13 November 2024) on fraud schemes using generative AI to circumvent identity verification…The Verification Desk83%Detected
Beneficial Ownership ObfuscationThe two largest beneficial ownership regimes moved in opposite directions within a year, and a structure is now easier to hide in…The Policy Book83%Detected
Cash-Intensive Front BusinessFCA v National Westminster Bank (2021): £264.8m criminal penalty over the Fowler Oldfield accountThe Client Engagement89%Detected
Mortgage and Property Finance FraudUK Finance, Mortgage Fraud: Good Practice Guidance Note; the FCA's mortgage fraud reporting scheme for lenders and advisers, and…The Client Account84%Detected
Sanctions-Evasion Ownership RestructuringOFSI and FCDO joint guidance on the meaning of ownership and control under UK sanctions, issued following Mints v National Bank…The Policy Book83%Detected

How this was measured

Each case is built around one customer who is laundering money. The rate is the share of that customer’s alerts the team caught.

Detected
Four fifths of them or more.
Partial
Between a half and four fifths.
Missed
Half or fewer.
Untested
No one has sat a case covering it.

Nothing is reported as detected on the strength of a good overall mark. Findings are suppressed below 3 runs on a case, because a smaller number describes one analyst rather than a team. Methods are declared on the case, not the individual alert, so this reports whether the team detected the method a case is built around rather than scoring each method separately.

Results are a diagnostic and carry no regulatory standing. They are not a professional qualification. The customers and transactions in each case are fictional; the methods they are based on are taken from the published sources cited above. AML Benchmark is a trading name of Net Werth Ltd, company number 12718042.

Produce this on your own team

£750 for one cohort of up to 25 people sitting the whole Property and Art Assessment, invoiced, with no licence and no notice period. Deducted from a licence if you take one within 90 days.

Arrange a pilot